
The theme for this evening was churches and bowling alleys.
I've had a compulsion recently for visiting places of worship after dark. I don't know what it is; I know it's not a disrespectful thing. If anything, I think I appreciate the idea of spiritual sanctuary and I feel it works better for me in solitude. I'm not a religious person by nature; I dislike the mob mentality it can stir up in people. Things like worship and faith are intensely personal, and as such, are best approached privately.

However, I photographed five churches tonight and as circumstances would have it, this was the only one that turned out any good. But no matter...it's my favorite of the bunch anyway.
I hit two bowling alleys. The second one was trying to pull off the "hipster bowling" makeover, with music and flashing lights and a DJ, but since it was in Falls Church, the hipsters were frat boys. I didn't get any interesting shots in there; I admit I felt a little intimidated by the stares at the dude in the coat with the camera. They even had a cop in there who casually followed me outside and stood there while I scribbled notes in my little book in the parking lot. This touches upon a big issue that I wrestle with, but before I get into that, let's move over to Annandale Lanes, the one the kid and I bowl at.

Back in the 50's and 60's, dudes like Winogrand and Friedlander would take their cameras out on the streets of New York and photograph everybody and everything and nobody batted an eye. Somewhere over the past 15 years, since the advent of the Internet really, people have become a lot more guarded around people with cameras. You are regarded as an interloper. People act as though you are trying to steal something from them, much the way some Native people believe a photograph steals the soul. And since 9/11, people even freak if you try to take a picture of a building. Every photographer becomes a potential terrorist-in-training.
The old question: when does photography cross the line into exploitation? If you go into a lower-income neighborhood and photograph less privileged people, are you using your art to draw attention to the brutal inequalities the people live with every day, or are you using the people to increase the aesthetic edginess of your art?
Do I have the right to photograph people in public? I have the legal right, but do I have the moral right?This may be part of the reason why I take pictures of parking garages and graveyards instead of shopping malls. And this sad tableau here on the right.
Anyhow, tonight I prepped the kid for the fact that I was gonna be out for a long shoot, and that really made a big difference. Three and and a half hours of driving around and I shot a lot more stuff, which means I can be more discriminating with the shots I put up here. The more of these longer shoots I do, the more my work is going to improve.





